From c132c32731b8c71166d67c655fdc0583e9eeea64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "copilot-swe-agent[bot]" <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2025 04:17:39 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Convert to UK English spelling (colourization, coloured)

Co-authored-by: mikefarah <1151925+mikefarah@users.noreply.github.com>
---
 pkg/yqlib/encoder_toml.go |  2 +-
 pkg/yqlib/toml_test.go    | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/pkg/yqlib/encoder_toml.go b/pkg/yqlib/encoder_toml.go
index 69342db5..3b789f04 100644
--- a/pkg/yqlib/encoder_toml.go
+++ b/pkg/yqlib/encoder_toml.go
@@ -566,7 +566,7 @@ func (te *tomlEncoder) colorizeToml(input []byte) []byte {
 
 		// Table sections - [section] or [[array]]
 		// Only treat '[' as a table section if it appears at the start of the line
-		// (possibly after whitespace). This avoids mis-coloring inline arrays like
+		// (possibly after whitespace). This avoids mis-colouring inline arrays like
 		// "ports = [8000, 8001]" as table sections.
 		if ch == '[' {
 			isSectionHeader := true
diff --git a/pkg/yqlib/toml_test.go b/pkg/yqlib/toml_test.go
index 7f79403d..028dba02 100644
--- a/pkg/yqlib/toml_test.go
+++ b/pkg/yqlib/toml_test.go
@@ -628,10 +628,10 @@ func TestTomlScenarios(t *testing.T) {
 	documentScenarios(t, "usage", "toml", genericScenarios, documentTomlScenario)
 }
 
-// TestTomlColorization tests that colorization correctly distinguishes
+// TestTomlColourization tests that colourization correctly distinguishes
 // between table section headers and inline arrays
-func TestTomlColorization(t *testing.T) {
-	// Test that inline arrays are not colored as table sections
+func TestTomlColourization(t *testing.T) {
+	// Test that inline arrays are not coloured as table sections
 	encoder := &tomlEncoder{prefs: TomlPreferences{ColorsEnabled: true}}
 	
 	// Create TOML with both table sections and inline arrays
@@ -647,15 +647,15 @@ alpha = "test"
 	resultStr := string(result)
 	
 	// The bug would cause the inline array [8000, 8001, 8002] to be
-	// colored with the section color (Yellow + Bold) instead of being
-	// left uncolored or colored differently.
+	// coloured with the section colour (Yellow + Bold) instead of being
+	// left uncoloured or coloured differently.
 	// 
-	// To test this, we check that the section color codes appear only
+	// To test this, we check that the section colour codes appear only
 	// for actual table sections, not for inline arrays.
 	
-	// Get the ANSI codes for section color (Yellow + Bold)
-	sectionColor := color.New(color.FgYellow, color.Bold).SprintFunc()
-	sampleSection := sectionColor("[database]")
+	// Get the ANSI codes for section colour (Yellow + Bold)
+	sectionColour := color.New(color.FgYellow, color.Bold).SprintFunc()
+	sampleSection := sectionColour("[database]")
 	
 	// Extract just the ANSI codes from the sample
 	// ANSI codes start with \x1b[
@@ -674,14 +674,14 @@ alpha = "test"
 		}
 	}
 	
-	// Count how many times the section color appears in the output
+	// Count how many times the section colour appears in the output
 	// It should appear exactly twice: once for [database] and once for [servers]
 	// If it appears more times (e.g., for [8000, 8001, 8002]), that's the bug
-	sectionColorCount := strings.Count(resultStr, ansiStart)
+	sectionColourCount := strings.Count(resultStr, ansiStart)
 	
 	// We expect exactly 2 occurrences (for [database] and [servers])
 	// The bug would cause more occurrences (e.g., also for [8000)
-	if sectionColorCount != 2 {
-		t.Errorf("Expected section color to appear exactly 2 times (for [database] and [servers]), but it appeared %d times.\nOutput: %s", sectionColorCount, resultStr)
+	if sectionColourCount != 2 {
+		t.Errorf("Expected section colour to appear exactly 2 times (for [database] and [servers]), but it appeared %d times.\nOutput: %s", sectionColourCount, resultStr)
 	}
 }