yq/acceptance_tests/nul-separator.sh

286 lines
8.3 KiB
Bash
Executable File

#!/bin/bash
setUp() {
rm test*.yml || true
}
## Convenient bash shortcut to read records of NUL separated values
## from stdin the safe way. See example usage in the next tests.
read-0() {
local eof="" IFS=''
while [ "$1" ]; do
## - The `-r` avoids bad surprise with '\n' and other interpreted
## sequences that can be read.
## - The `-d ''` is the (strange?) way to refer to NUL delimiter.
## - The `--` is how to avoid unpleasant surprises if your
## "$1" starts with "-" (minus) sign. This protection also
## will produce a readable error if you want to try to start
## your variable names with a "-".
read -r -d '' -- "$1" || eof=1
shift
done
[ -z "$eof" ] ## fail on EOF
}
## Convenient bash shortcut to be used with the next function `p-err`
## to read NUL separated values the safe way AND catch any errors from
## the process creating the stream of NUL separated data. See example
## usage in the tests.
read-0-err() {
local ret="$1" eof="" idx=0 last=
read -r -- "${ret?}" <<<"0"
shift
while [ "$1" ]; do
last=$idx
read -r -d '' -- "$1" || {
## Put this last value in ${!ret}
eof="$1"
read -r -- "$ret" <<<"${!eof}"
break
}
((idx++))
shift
done
[ -z "$eof" ] || {
if [ "$last" != 0 ]; then
## Uhoh, we have no idea if the errorlevel of the internal
## command was properly delimited with a NUL char, and
## anyway something went really wrong at least about the
## number of fields separated by NUL char and the one
## expected.
echo "Error: read-0-err couldn't fill all value $ret = '${!ret}', '$eof', '${!eof}'" >&2
read -r -- "$ret" <<<"not-enough-values"
else
if ! [[ "${!ret}" =~ ^[0-9]+$ && "${!ret}" -ge 0 && "${!ret}" -le 127 ]]; then
## This could happen if you don't use `p-err` wrapper,
## or used stdout in unexpected ways in your inner
## command.
echo "Error: last value is not a number, did you finish with an errorlevel ?" >&2
read -r -- "$ret" <<<"last-value-not-a-number"
fi
fi
false
}
}
## Simply runs command given as argument and adds errorlevel in the
## standard output. Is expected to be used in tandem with
## `read-0-err`.
p-err() {
local exp="$1"
"$@"
printf "%s" "$?"
}
wyq-r() {
local exp="$1"
./yq e -0 -r=false "$1"
printf "%s" "$?"
}
testBasicUsageRaw() {
cat >test.yml <<EOL
a: foo
b: bar
EOL
printf "foo\0bar\0" > expected.out
## We need to compare binary content here. We have to filter the compared
## content through a representation that gets rid of NUL chars but accurately
## transcribe the content.
## Also as it would be nice to have a pretty output in case the test fails,
## we use here 'hd': a widely available shortcut to 'hexdump' that will
## pretty-print any binary to it's hexadecimal representation.
##
## Note that the standard `assertEquals` compare its arguments
## value, but they can't hold NUL characters (this comes from the
## limitation of the C API of `exec*(..)` functions that requires
## `const char *arv[]`). And these are NUL terminated strings. As a
## consequence, the NUL characters gets removed in bash arguments.
assertEquals "$(hd expected.out)" \
"$(./yq e -0 '.a, .b' test.yml | hd)"
rm expected.out
}
testBasicUsage() {
local a b
cat >test.yml <<EOL
a: foo
b: bar
EOL
## We provide 2 values, and ask to fill 2 variables.
read-0 a b < <(./yq e -0 '.a, .b' test.yml)
assertEquals "$?" "0" ## Everything is fine
assertEquals "foo" "$a" ## Values are correctly parsed
assertEquals "bar" "$b"
a=YYY ; b=XXX
## Not enough values provided to fill `a` and `b`.
read-0 a b < <(./yq e -0 '.a' test.yml)
assertEquals "$?" "1" ## An error was emitted
assertEquals "foo" "$a" ## First value was correctly parsed
assertEquals "" "$b" ## Second was still reset
## Error from inner command are not catchable !. Use
## `read-0-err`/`p-err` for that.
read-0 a < <(printf "\0"; ./yq e -0 'xxx' test.yml; )
assertEquals "$?" "0"
}
testBasicUsageJson() {
cat >test.yml <<EOL
a:
x: foo
b: bar
EOL
read-0 a b < <(./yq e -0 -o=json '.a, .b' test.yml)
assertEquals '{
"x": "foo"
}' "$a"
assertEquals '"bar"' "$b"
}
testFailWithValueContainingNUL() {
local a b c
## Note that value of field 'a' actually contains a NUL char !
cat >test.yml <<EOL
a: "foo\u0000bar"
b: 1
c: |
wiz
boom
EOL
## We are looking for trouble with asking to separated fields with NUL
## char and requested value `.a` actually contains itself a NUL char !
read-0 a b c < <(./yq e -0 '.a, .b, .c' test.yml)
assertNotEquals "0" "$?" ## read-0 failed to fill all values
## But here, we can request for one value, even if `./yq` fails
read-0 b < <(./yq e -0 '.b, .a' test.yml)
assertEquals "0" "$?" ## read-0 succeeds at feeding the first value
## Note: to catch the failure of `yq`, see in the next tests the usage
## of `read-0-err`.
## using -r=false solves any NUL containing value issues, but keeps
## all in YAML representation:
read-0 a b c < <(./yq e -0 -r=false '.a, .b, .c' test.yml)
assertEquals "0" "$?" ## All goes well despite asking for `a` value
assertEquals '"foo\0bar"' "$a" ## This is a YAML string representation
assertEquals '1' "$b"
assertEquals '|
wiz
boom' "$c"
}
testStandardLoop() {
local E a b res
## Here everything is normal: 4 values, that will be paired
## in key/values.
cat >test.yml <<EOL
- yay
- wiz
- hop
- pow
EOL
res=""
while read-0-err E a b; do
res+="$a: $b;"
done < <(p-err ./yq -0 '.[]' test.yml)
assertEquals "0" "$E" ## errorlevel of internal command
assertEquals "yay: wiz;hop: pow;" "$res" ## expected result
}
testStandardLoopWithoutEnoughValues() {
local E a b res
## Here 5 values, there will be a missing value when reading
## pairs of value.
cat >test.yml <<EOL
- yay
- wiz
- hop
- pow
- kwak
EOL
res=""
## The loop will succeed 2 times then fail
while read-0-err E a b; do
res+="$a: $b;"
done < <(p-err ./yq -0 '.[]' test.yml)
assertEquals "not-enough-values" "$E" ## Not enough value error
assertEquals "yay: wiz;hop: pow;" "$res" ## the 2 full key/value pairs
}
testStandardLoopWithInternalCmdError() {
local E a b res
## Note the third value contains a NUL char !
cat >test.yml <<EOL
- yay
- wiz
- "foo\0bar"
- hop
- pow
EOL
res=""
## It should be only upon the second pass in the loop that
## read-0-err will catch the fact that there is an error !
while read-0-err E a b; do
res+="$a: $b;"
done < <(p-err ./yq -0 '.[]' test.yml)
assertEquals "1" "$E" ## Internal command errorlevel (from `./yq`)
assertEquals "yay: wiz;" "$res" ## first 2 values were ok at least
}
testStandardLoopNotEnoughErrorEatsCmdError() {
local E a b res
## Because of possible edge cases where the internal errorlevel
## reported by `p-err` in the standard output might be mangled
## with the unfinished record, `read-0-err E ...` will NOT report
## the internal command error in the variable E and instead will
## store the value 'not-enough-values'. In real world, anyway, you
## will want to react the same if the internal command failed
## and/or you didn't get as much values as expected while
## reading. Keep in mind also that standard error is not
## swallowed, so you can read reports from the inner command AND
## from `read-0-err`.
## Here, note that the fourth value contains a NUL char !
cat >test.yml <<EOL
- yay
- wiz
- hop
- "foo\0bar"
- pow
EOL
res=""
## It should be only upon the second loop that read-0-err will catch
## the fact that there are not enough data to fill the requested variables
while read-0-err E a b; do
res+="$a: $b;"
done < <(p-err ./yq -0 '.[]' test.yml)
assertEquals "not-enough-values" "$E" ## Not enough values error eats internal error !
assertEquals "yay: wiz;" "$res" ## first 2 values were ok at least
}
source ./scripts/shunit2